Speed and Duplex Auto negotiation
Fast Ethernet is backwards-compatible with the original Ethernet standard.
A device that supports both Ethernet and Fast Ethernet is often referred to as
a 10/100 device.
Fast Ethernet also introduced the ability to autonegotiate both the speed and
duplex of an interface. Autonegotiation will attempt to use the fastest speed
available, and will attempt to use full-duplex if both devices support it.
Speed and duplex can also be hardcoded, preventing negotiation.
The configuration must be consistent on both sides of the connection. Either
both sides must be configured to autonegotiate, or both sides must be
hardcoded with identical settings. Otherwise a duplex mismatch error can
occur.
For example, if a workstation’s NIC is configured to autonegotiate, and the
switch interface is hardcoded for 100Mbps and full-duplex, then a duplex
mismatch will occur. The workstation’s NIC will sense the correct speed of
100Mbps, but will not detect the correct duplex and will default to halfduplex.
If the duplex is mismatched, collisions will occur. Because the full-duplex
side of the connection does not utilize CSMA/CD, performance is severely
degraded. These issues can be difficult to troubleshoot, as the network
connection will still function, but will be excruciatingly slow.
When autonegotiation was first developed, manufacturers did not always
adhere to the same standard. This resulted in frequent mismatch issues, and a
sentiment of distrust towards autonegotiation.
Though modern network hardware has alleviated most of the
incompatibility, many administrators are still skeptical of autonegotiation
and choose to hardcode all connections. Another common practice is to
hardcode server and datacenter connections, but to allow user devices to
autonegotiate.
Gigabit Ethernet, covered in the next section, provided several
enhancements to autonegotiation, such as hardware flow control. Most
manufacturers recommend autonegotiation on Gigabit Ethernet interfaces
as a best practice.
A device that supports both Ethernet and Fast Ethernet is often referred to as
a 10/100 device.
Fast Ethernet also introduced the ability to autonegotiate both the speed and
duplex of an interface. Autonegotiation will attempt to use the fastest speed
available, and will attempt to use full-duplex if both devices support it.
Speed and duplex can also be hardcoded, preventing negotiation.
The configuration must be consistent on both sides of the connection. Either
both sides must be configured to autonegotiate, or both sides must be
hardcoded with identical settings. Otherwise a duplex mismatch error can
occur.
For example, if a workstation’s NIC is configured to autonegotiate, and the
switch interface is hardcoded for 100Mbps and full-duplex, then a duplex
mismatch will occur. The workstation’s NIC will sense the correct speed of
100Mbps, but will not detect the correct duplex and will default to halfduplex.
If the duplex is mismatched, collisions will occur. Because the full-duplex
side of the connection does not utilize CSMA/CD, performance is severely
degraded. These issues can be difficult to troubleshoot, as the network
connection will still function, but will be excruciatingly slow.
When autonegotiation was first developed, manufacturers did not always
adhere to the same standard. This resulted in frequent mismatch issues, and a
sentiment of distrust towards autonegotiation.
Though modern network hardware has alleviated most of the
incompatibility, many administrators are still skeptical of autonegotiation
and choose to hardcode all connections. Another common practice is to
hardcode server and datacenter connections, but to allow user devices to
autonegotiate.
Gigabit Ethernet, covered in the next section, provided several
enhancements to autonegotiation, such as hardware flow control. Most
manufacturers recommend autonegotiation on Gigabit Ethernet interfaces
as a best practice.
0 comments:
Post a Comment