Thursday, November 3, 2016

The Difference Between Layer 3 Switching and Routing

Layer-3 Switching vs. Routing – End the Confusion!


The evolution of network technologies has led to considerable confusion
over the terms switch and router. Remember the following:
• The traditional definition of a switch is a device that performs Layer-2
forwarding decisions.
• The traditional definition of a router is a device that performs Layer-3
forwarding decisions.

Remember also that, switching functions were typically performed in
hardware, and routing functions were typically performed in software. This
resulted in a widespread perception that switching was fast, and routing was
slow (and expensive).

Once Layer-3 forwarding became available in hardware, marketing gurus
muddied the waters by distancing themselves from the term router. Though
Layer-3 forwarding in hardware is still routing in every technical sense, such
devices were rebranded as Layer-3 switches.

Ignore the marketing noise. A Layer-3 switch is still a router.

Compounding matters further, most devices still currently referred to as
routers can perform Layer-3 forwarding in hardware as well. Thus, both
Layer-3 switches and Layer-3 routers perform nearly identical functions at
the same performance.

There are some differences in implementation between Layer-3 switches and
routers, including (but not limited to):
• Layer-3 switches are optimized for Ethernet, and are predominantly
used for inter-VLAN routing. Layer-3 switches can also provide
Layer-2 functionality for intra-VLAN traffic.
• Switches generally have higher port densities than routers, and are
considerably cheaper per port than routers (for Ethernet, at least).
• Routers support a large number of WAN technologies, while Layer-3
switches generally do not.
• Routers generally support more advanced feature sets.

Layer-3 switches are often deployed as the backbone of LAN or campus
networks. Routers are predominantly used on network perimeters,
connecting to WAN environments.

Multilayer Switching

Related Posts:

  • Categories of Ethernet speed and duplex auto negotiation Categories of Ethernet The original 802.3 Ethernet standard has evolved over time, supporting faster transmissi… Read More
  • Speed and Duplex Autonegotiation Speed and Duplex Auto negotiation Fast Ethernet is backwards-compatible with the original Ethernet standard.A device that supports both Ethernet … Read More
  • The Ethernet Frame The Ethernet Frame An Ethernet frame contains the following fields: The preamble is 56 bits of alternating 1s and 0s that synchronizescom… Read More
  • Full-Duplex Communication Full-Duplex Communication Unlike half-duplex, full-duplex Ethernet supports simultaneouslycommunication by providing separate transmit and receive p… Read More
  • CSMA/CD and Half-Duplex Communication CSMA/CD and Half-Duplex Communication Ethernet was originally developed to support a shared media environment.This allowed two or more hosts to us… Read More

0 comments:

Post a Comment